diff options
| author | django-bot <ops@djangoproject.com> | 2025-07-22 20:41:41 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | nessita <124304+nessita@users.noreply.github.com> | 2025-07-23 20:17:55 -0300 |
| commit | 69a93a88edb56ba47f624dac7a21aacc47ea474f (patch) | |
| tree | f57507a4435d032493cae40e06ecb254790b67b2 /tests/aggregation_regress/tests.py | |
| parent | 55b0cc21310b76ce4018dd793ba50556eaf0af06 (diff) | |
Refs #36500 -- Rewrapped long docstrings and block comments via a script.
Rewrapped long docstrings and block comments to 79 characters + newline
using script from https://github.com/medmunds/autofix-w505.
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/aggregation_regress/tests.py')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/aggregation_regress/tests.py | 27 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/tests/aggregation_regress/tests.py b/tests/aggregation_regress/tests.py index 9199bf3eba..3e1a6a71f9 100644 --- a/tests/aggregation_regress/tests.py +++ b/tests/aggregation_regress/tests.py @@ -314,7 +314,8 @@ class AggregationTests(TestCase): publisher_id=self.p2.id, rating=3.0, ) - # Different DB backends return different types for the extra select computation + # Different DB backends return different types for the extra select + # computation self.assertIn(obj.manufacture_cost, (11.545, Decimal("11.545"))) # Order of the annotate/extra in the query doesn't matter @@ -335,7 +336,8 @@ class AggregationTests(TestCase): publisher_id=self.p2.id, rating=3.0, ) - # Different DB backends return different types for the extra select computation + # Different DB backends return different types for the extra select + # computation self.assertIn(obj.manufacture_cost, (11.545, Decimal("11.545"))) # Values queries can be combined with annotate and extra @@ -498,8 +500,8 @@ class AggregationTests(TestCase): }, ) - # Regression for #15624 - Missing SELECT columns when using values, annotate - # and aggregate in a single query + # Regression for #15624 - Missing SELECT columns when using values, + # annotate and aggregate in a single query self.assertEqual( Book.objects.annotate(c=Count("authors")).values("c").aggregate(Max("c")), {"c__max": 3}, @@ -935,11 +937,13 @@ class AggregationTests(TestCase): .order_by() .query ) - # There is just one GROUP BY clause (zero commas means at most one clause). + # There is just one GROUP BY clause (zero commas means at most one + # clause). self.assertEqual(qstr[qstr.index("GROUP BY") :].count(", "), 0) def test_duplicate_alias(self): - # Regression for #11256 - duplicating a default alias raises ValueError. + # Regression for #11256 - duplicating a default alias raises + # ValueError. msg = ( "The named annotation 'authors__age__avg' conflicts with " "the default name for another annotation." @@ -1004,7 +1008,8 @@ class AggregationTests(TestCase): def test_reverse_relation_name_conflict(self): # Regression for #11256 - providing an aggregate name - # that conflicts with a reverse-related name on the model raises ValueError + # that conflicts with a reverse-related name on the model raises + # ValueError msg = "The annotation 'book_contact_set' conflicts with a field on the model." with self.assertRaisesMessage(ValueError, msg): Author.objects.annotate(book_contact_set=Avg("friends__age")) @@ -1417,8 +1422,8 @@ class AggregationTests(TestCase): def test_annotate_joins(self): """ The base table's join isn't promoted to LOUTER. This could - cause the query generation to fail if there is an exclude() for fk-field - in the query, too. Refs #19087. + cause the query generation to fail if there is an exclude() for + fk-field in the query, too. Refs #19087. """ qs = Book.objects.annotate(n=Count("pk")) self.assertIs(qs.query.alias_map["aggregation_regress_book"].join_type, None) @@ -1934,8 +1939,8 @@ class JoinPromotionTests(TestCase): Count("alfa__name") ) self.assertIn(" INNER JOIN ", str(qs.query)) - # Also, the existing join is unpromoted when doing filtering for already - # promoted join. + # Also, the existing join is unpromoted when doing filtering for + # already promoted join. qs = Charlie.objects.annotate(Count("alfa__name")).filter( alfa__name__isnull=False ) |
