summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRamiro Morales <cramm0@gmail.com>2014-06-25 12:15:20 -0300
committerTim Graham <timograham@gmail.com>2014-06-25 12:32:14 -0400
commit54a6ab207762bf581bf74e7e3d6b9e0520864baa (patch)
treee1867468356c4c2481a007087947723b900e1082 /docs
parentf1428dc796817a241d49319122663129d78ca853 (diff)
[1.7.x] Fixed typo in revamped forms intro doc.
Backport of 77c0a904cb from master
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
-rw-r--r--docs/topics/forms/index.txt2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/docs/topics/forms/index.txt b/docs/topics/forms/index.txt
index 054cb19deb..021bdd2ff1 100644
--- a/docs/topics/forms/index.txt
+++ b/docs/topics/forms/index.txt
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ all in plaintext. Neither would it be suitable for large quantities of data,
or for binary data, such as an image. A web application that uses ``GET``
requests for admin forms is a security risk: it can be easy for an attacker to
mimic a form's request to gain access to sensitive parts of the system.
-``POST``, coupled with other protections like Django's:doc:`CSRF protection
+``POST``, coupled with other protections like Django's :doc:`CSRF protection
</ref/contrib/csrf/>` offers more control over access.
On the other hand, ``GET`` is suitable for things like a web search form,