Fixed #30573 -- Rephrased documentation to avoid words that minimise the involved difficulty.

This patch does not remove all occurrences of the words in question.
Rather, I went through all of the occurrences of the words listed
below, and judged if they a) suggested the reader had some kind of
knowledge/experience, and b) if they added anything of value (including
tone of voice, etc). I left most of the words alone. I looked at the
following words:

- simply/simple
- easy/easier/easiest
- obvious
- just
- merely
- straightforward
- ridiculous

Thanks to Carlton Gibson for guidance on how to approach this issue, and
to Tim Bell for providing the idea. But the enormous lion's share of
thanks go to Adam Johnson for his patient and helpful review.

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/docs/ref/forms/widgets.txt b/docs/ref/forms/widgets.txt
index d649ece6ba..6b341620ee 100644
--- a/docs/ref/forms/widgets.txt
+++ b/docs/ref/forms/widgets.txt
@@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ which widget is used on which field, see the documentation about
 :ref:`built-in-fields`.
 
 However, if you want to use a different widget for a field, you can
-just use the :attr:`~Field.widget` argument on the field definition. For
-example::
+use the :attr:`~Field.widget` argument on the field definition. For example::
 
     from django import forms
 
@@ -127,7 +126,7 @@ need to specify additional attributes at the time when the widget object is
 instantiated and assigned to a form field (and perhaps add some rules to your
 CSS files).
 
-For example, take the following simple form::
+For example, take the following form::
 
     from django import forms
 
@@ -770,8 +769,8 @@ that specifies the template used to render each choice. For example, for the
         </label>
 
     If you decide not to loop over the radio buttons -- e.g., if your template
-    simply includes ``{{ myform.beatles }}`` -- they'll be output in a ``<ul>``
-    with ``<li>`` tags, as above.
+    includes ``{{ myform.beatles }}`` -- they'll be output in a ``<ul>`` with
+    ``<li>`` tags, as above.
 
     The outer ``<ul>`` container receives the ``id`` attribute of the widget,
     if defined, or :attr:`BoundField.auto_id` otherwise.