Added a test to demonstrate the remaining problem in #7095.

Only fails for MySQL (because they've made some interesting syntax choices).
Refs #7095.


git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7495 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37

1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py b/tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py
index e108c46352..6fd361ec19 100644
--- a/tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py
+++ b/tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py
@@ -117,6 +117,24 @@ class LoopZ(models.Model):
     class Meta:
         ordering = ['z']
 
+# A model and custom default manager combination.
+class CustomManager(models.Manager):
+    def get_query_set(self):
+        return super(CustomManager, self).get_query_set().filter(public=True,
+                tag__name='t1')
+
+class ManagedModel(models.Model):
+    data = models.CharField(max_length=10)
+    tag = models.ForeignKey(Tag)
+    public = models.BooleanField(default=True)
+
+    objects = CustomManager()
+    normal_manager = models.Manager()
+
+    def __unicode__(self):
+        return self.data
+
+
 __test__ = {'API_TESTS':"""
 >>> t1 = Tag(name='t1')
 >>> t1.save()
@@ -677,5 +695,11 @@ More twisted cases, involving nested negations.
 >>> Item.objects.exclude(~Q(tags__name='t1', name='one'), name='two')
 [<Item: four>, <Item: one>, <Item: three>]
 
+Bug #7095
+Updates that are filtered on the model being updated are somewhat tricky to get
+in MySQL. This exercises that case.
+>>> mm = ManagedModel.objects.create(data='mm1', tag=t1, public=True)
+>>> ManagedModel.objects.update(data='mm')
+
 """}