summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnssi Kääriäinen <akaariai@gmail.com>2014-01-08 19:35:47 +0200
committerAnssi Kääriäinen <akaariai@gmail.com>2014-02-04 18:48:06 +0200
commit35cecb1ebd0ccda0be7a518d1b7273333d26fbae (patch)
tree80bf011330ecea76aaebaf4660e28bf9f8032098
parent867f8fd6c7f204769f2c72d1684b5c8c220aa5b4 (diff)
Fixed #21748 -- join promotion for negated AND conditions
Made sure Django treats case .filter(NOT (a AND b)) the same way as .filter((NOT a OR NOT b)) for join promotion.
-rw-r--r--django/db/models/sql/query.py24
-rw-r--r--tests/queries/tests.py79
2 files changed, 95 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/django/db/models/sql/query.py b/django/db/models/sql/query.py
index 838c2914d9..79a4459e2f 100644
--- a/django/db/models/sql/query.py
+++ b/django/db/models/sql/query.py
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ class Query(object):
# Base table must be present in the query - this is the same
# table on both sides.
self.get_initial_alias()
- joinpromoter = JoinPromoter(connector, 2)
+ joinpromoter = JoinPromoter(connector, 2, False)
joinpromoter.add_votes(
j for j in self.alias_map if self.alias_map[j].join_type == self.INNER)
rhs_votes = set()
@@ -1299,11 +1299,9 @@ class Query(object):
connector = q_object.connector
current_negated = current_negated ^ q_object.negated
branch_negated = branch_negated or q_object.negated
- # Note that if the connector happens to match what we have already in
- # the tree, the add will be a no-op.
target_clause = self.where_class(connector=connector,
negated=q_object.negated)
- joinpromoter = JoinPromoter(q_object.connector, len(q_object.children))
+ joinpromoter = JoinPromoter(q_object.connector, len(q_object.children), current_negated)
for child in q_object.children:
if isinstance(child, Node):
child_clause, needed_inner = self._add_q(
@@ -2013,8 +2011,16 @@ class JoinPromoter(object):
conditions.
"""
- def __init__(self, connector, num_children):
+ def __init__(self, connector, num_children, negated):
self.connector = connector
+ self.negated = negated
+ if self.negated:
+ if connector == AND:
+ self.effective_connector = OR
+ else:
+ self.effective_connector = AND
+ else:
+ self.effective_connector = self.connector
self.num_children = num_children
# Maps of table alias to how many times it is seen as required for
# inner and/or outer joins.
@@ -2038,6 +2044,8 @@ class JoinPromoter(object):
"""
to_promote = set()
to_demote = set()
+ # The effective_connector is used so that NOT (a AND b) is treated
+ # similarly to (a OR b) for join promotion.
for table, votes in self.inner_votes.items():
# We must use outer joins in OR case when the join isn't contained
# in all of the joins. Otherwise the INNER JOIN itself could remove
@@ -2049,7 +2057,7 @@ class JoinPromoter(object):
# to rel_a would remove a valid match from the query. So, we need
# to promote any existing INNER to LOUTER (it is possible this
# promotion in turn will be demoted later on).
- if self.connector == 'OR' and votes < self.num_children:
+ if self.effective_connector == 'OR' and votes < self.num_children:
to_promote.add(table)
# If connector is AND and there is a filter that can match only
# when there is a joinable row, then use INNER. For example, in
@@ -2061,8 +2069,8 @@ class JoinPromoter(object):
# (rel_a__col__icontains=Alex | rel_a__col__icontains=Russell)
# then if rel_a doesn't produce any rows, the whole condition
# can't match. Hence we can safely use INNER join.
- if self.connector == 'AND' or (self.connector == 'OR' and
- votes == self.num_children):
+ if self.effective_connector == 'AND' or (
+ self.effective_connector == 'OR' and votes == self.num_children):
to_demote.add(table)
# Finally, what happens in cases where we have:
# (rel_a__col=1|rel_b__col=2) & rel_a__col__gte=0
diff --git a/tests/queries/tests.py b/tests/queries/tests.py
index 6bf90cdbf9..3f861db5d1 100644
--- a/tests/queries/tests.py
+++ b/tests/queries/tests.py
@@ -2799,6 +2799,85 @@ class NullJoinPromotionOrTest(TestCase):
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
qs.order_by('name'), [r2, r1], lambda x: x)
+ def test_ticket_21748(self):
+ i1 = Identifier.objects.create(name='i1')
+ i2 = Identifier.objects.create(name='i2')
+ i3 = Identifier.objects.create(name='i3')
+ Program.objects.create(identifier=i1)
+ Channel.objects.create(identifier=i1)
+ Program.objects.create(identifier=i2)
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(
+ Identifier.objects.filter(program=None, channel=None),
+ [i3], lambda x: x)
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(
+ Identifier.objects.exclude(program=None, channel=None).order_by('name'),
+ [i1, i2], lambda x: x)
+
+ def test_ticket_21748_double_negated_and(self):
+ i1 = Identifier.objects.create(name='i1')
+ i2 = Identifier.objects.create(name='i2')
+ Identifier.objects.create(name='i3')
+ p1 = Program.objects.create(identifier=i1)
+ c1 = Channel.objects.create(identifier=i1)
+ Program.objects.create(identifier=i2)
+ # Check the ~~Q() (or equivalently .exclude(~Q)) works like Q() for
+ # join promotion.
+ qs1_doubleneg = Identifier.objects.exclude(~Q(program__id=p1.id, channel__id=c1.id)).order_by('pk')
+ qs1_filter = Identifier.objects.filter(program__id=p1.id, channel__id=c1.id).order_by('pk')
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(qs1_doubleneg, qs1_filter, lambda x: x)
+ self.assertEqual(str(qs1_filter.query).count('JOIN'),
+ str(qs1_doubleneg.query).count('JOIN'))
+ self.assertEqual(2, str(qs1_doubleneg.query).count('INNER JOIN'))
+ self.assertEqual(str(qs1_filter.query).count('INNER JOIN'),
+ str(qs1_doubleneg.query).count('INNER JOIN'))
+
+ def test_ticket_21748_double_negated_or(self):
+ i1 = Identifier.objects.create(name='i1')
+ i2 = Identifier.objects.create(name='i2')
+ Identifier.objects.create(name='i3')
+ p1 = Program.objects.create(identifier=i1)
+ c1 = Channel.objects.create(identifier=i1)
+ p2 = Program.objects.create(identifier=i2)
+ # Test OR + doubleneq. The expected result is that channel is LOUTER
+ # joined, program INNER joined
+ qs1_filter = Identifier.objects.filter(
+ Q(program__id=p2.id, channel__id=c1.id)
+ | Q(program__id=p1.id)
+ ).order_by('pk')
+ qs1_doubleneg = Identifier.objects.exclude(
+ ~Q(Q(program__id=p2.id, channel__id=c1.id)
+ | Q(program__id=p1.id))
+ ).order_by('pk')
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(qs1_doubleneg, qs1_filter, lambda x: x)
+ self.assertEqual(str(qs1_filter.query).count('JOIN'),
+ str(qs1_doubleneg.query).count('JOIN'))
+ self.assertEqual(1, str(qs1_doubleneg.query).count('INNER JOIN'))
+ self.assertEqual(str(qs1_filter.query).count('INNER JOIN'),
+ str(qs1_doubleneg.query).count('INNER JOIN'))
+
+ def test_ticket_21748_complex_filter(self):
+ i1 = Identifier.objects.create(name='i1')
+ i2 = Identifier.objects.create(name='i2')
+ Identifier.objects.create(name='i3')
+ p1 = Program.objects.create(identifier=i1)
+ c1 = Channel.objects.create(identifier=i1)
+ p2 = Program.objects.create(identifier=i2)
+ # Finally, a more complex case, one time in a way where each
+ # NOT is pushed to lowest level in the boolean tree, and
+ # another query where this isn't done.
+ qs1 = Identifier.objects.filter(
+ ~Q(~Q(program__id=p2.id, channel__id=c1.id)
+ & Q(program__id=p1.id))).order_by('pk')
+ qs2 = Identifier.objects.filter(
+ Q(Q(program__id=p2.id, channel__id=c1.id)
+ | ~Q(program__id=p1.id))).order_by('pk')
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(qs1, qs2, lambda x: x)
+ self.assertEqual(str(qs1.query).count('JOIN'),
+ str(qs2.query).count('JOIN'))
+ self.assertEqual(0, str(qs1.query).count('INNER JOIN'))
+ self.assertEqual(str(qs1.query).count('INNER JOIN'),
+ str(qs2.query).count('INNER JOIN'))
+
class ReverseJoinTrimmingTest(TestCase):
def test_reverse_trimming(self):