summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnssi Kääriäinen <akaariai@gmail.com>2014-12-17 09:47:58 +0200
committerAnssi Kääriäinen <akaariai@gmail.com>2014-12-17 10:04:52 +0200
commit1c5cbf5e5d5b350f4df4aca6431d46c767d3785a (patch)
tree67936c8b01816f44e8cd670e7033f81fbde8597d
parent104aaab7049afc6ef456fee52763f6d4f7dd575d (diff)
Fixed #24002 -- GenericRelation filtering targets related model's pk
Previously Publisher.objects.filter(book=val) would target book.object_id if book is a GenericRelation. This is inconsistent to filtering over reverse foreign key relations, where the target is the related model's primary key.
-rw-r--r--django/contrib/contenttypes/fields.py2
-rw-r--r--tests/generic_relations_regress/tests.py16
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/django/contrib/contenttypes/fields.py b/django/contrib/contenttypes/fields.py
index cc115b01aa..ee855e7cae 100644
--- a/django/contrib/contenttypes/fields.py
+++ b/django/contrib/contenttypes/fields.py
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ class GenericRelation(ForeignObject):
def get_path_info(self):
opts = self.rel.to._meta
- target = opts.get_field_by_name(self.object_id_field_name)[0]
+ target = opts.pk
return [PathInfo(self.model._meta, opts, (target,), self.rel, True, False)]
def get_reverse_path_info(self):
diff --git a/tests/generic_relations_regress/tests.py b/tests/generic_relations_regress/tests.py
index 5b0f48c1b0..65afa9f298 100644
--- a/tests/generic_relations_regress/tests.py
+++ b/tests/generic_relations_regress/tests.py
@@ -220,15 +220,18 @@ class GenericRelationTests(TestCase):
def test_annotate(self):
hs1 = HasLinkThing.objects.create()
+ hs2 = HasLinkThing.objects.create()
+ HasLinkThing.objects.create()
b = Board.objects.create(name=str(hs1.pk))
+ Link.objects.create(content_object=hs2)
l = Link.objects.create(content_object=hs1)
Link.objects.create(content_object=b)
- qs = HasLinkThing.objects.annotate(Sum('links'))
+ qs = HasLinkThing.objects.annotate(Sum('links')).filter(pk=hs1.pk)
# If content_type restriction isn't in the query's join condition,
# then wrong results are produced here as the link to b will also match
# (b and hs1 have equal pks).
self.assertEqual(qs.count(), 1)
- self.assertEqual(qs[0].links__sum, hs1.id)
+ self.assertEqual(qs[0].links__sum, l.id)
l.delete()
# Now if we don't have proper left join, we will not produce any
# results at all here.
@@ -241,6 +244,15 @@ class GenericRelationTests(TestCase):
self.assertEqual(qs.filter(links__sum__isnull=True).count(), 1)
self.assertEqual(qs.filter(links__sum__isnull=False).count(), 0)
+ def test_filter_targets_related_pk(self):
+ HasLinkThing.objects.create()
+ hs2 = HasLinkThing.objects.create()
+ l = Link.objects.create(content_object=hs2)
+ self.assertNotEqual(l.object_id, l.pk)
+ self.assertQuerysetEqual(
+ HasLinkThing.objects.filter(links=l.pk),
+ [hs2], lambda x: x)
+
def test_editable_generic_rel(self):
GenericRelationForm = modelform_factory(HasLinkThing, fields='__all__')
form = GenericRelationForm()