diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/invalid_models_tests/test_relative_fields.py')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/invalid_models_tests/test_relative_fields.py | 393 |
1 files changed, 190 insertions, 203 deletions
diff --git a/tests/invalid_models_tests/test_relative_fields.py b/tests/invalid_models_tests/test_relative_fields.py index 6846ece512..2d54650414 100644 --- a/tests/invalid_models_tests/test_relative_fields.py +++ b/tests/invalid_models_tests/test_relative_fields.py @@ -34,13 +34,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check() expected = [ Error( - ('The field has a relation with model Rel1, ' - 'which has either not been installed or is abstract.'), - hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and ' - 'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS ' - 'setting contain the app where Rel1 is defined?'), + ("Field defines a relation with model 'Rel1', " + "which is either not installed, or is abstract."), + hint=None, obj=field, - id='E030', + id='fields.E300', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -53,13 +51,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check(from_model=Model) expected = [ Error( - ('The field has a relation with model Rel2, ' - 'which has either not been installed or is abstract.'), - hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and ' - 'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS ' - 'setting contain the app where Rel2 is defined?'), + ("Field defines a relation with model 'Rel2', " + "which is either not installed, or is abstract."), + hint=None, obj=field, - id='E030', + id='fields.E300', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -83,15 +79,14 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check(from_model=Group) expected = [ Error( - ('The model is used as an intermediary model by ' - 'invalid_models_tests.Group.field, but it has more than one ' - 'foreign key to Person, ' - 'which is ambiguous and is not permitted.'), + ("The model is used as an intermediate model by " + "'invalid_models_tests.Group.field', but it has more than one " + "foreign key to 'Person', which is ambiguous."), hint=('If you want to create a recursive relationship, use ' 'ForeignKey("self", symmetrical=False, ' 'through="AmbiguousRelationship").'), obj=field, - id='E027', + id='fields.E335', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -116,12 +111,12 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check(from_model=Group) expected = [ Error( - ('The model is used as an intermediary model by ' - 'invalid_models_tests.Group.members, but it misses ' - 'a foreign key to Group or Person.'), + ("The model is used as an intermediate model by " + "'invalid_models_tests.Group.members', but it does not " + "have a foreign key to 'Group' or 'Person'."), hint=None, obj=InvalidRelationship, - id='E028', + id='fields.E336', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -142,12 +137,12 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check(from_model=Group) expected = [ Error( - ('The model is used as an intermediary model by ' - 'invalid_models_tests.Group.members, but it misses ' - 'a foreign key to Group or Person.'), + ("The model is used as an intermediate model by " + "'invalid_models_tests.Group.members', but it does not have " + "a foreign key to 'Group' or 'Person'."), hint=None, obj=InvalidRelationship, - id='E028', + id='fields.E336', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -164,13 +159,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check(from_model=Group) expected = [ Error( - ('The field specifies a many-to-many relation through model ' - 'MissingM2MModel, which has not been installed.'), - hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and ' - 'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS ' - 'setting contain the app where MissingM2MModel is defined?'), + ("Field specifies a many-to-many relation through model " + "'MissingM2MModel', which has not been installed."), + hint=None, obj=field, - id='E023', + id='fields.E331', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -191,7 +184,7 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): 'Many-to-many fields with intermediate tables must not be symmetrical.', hint=None, obj=field, - id='E024', + id='fields.E332', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -210,13 +203,12 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check(from_model=Person) expected = [ Error( - ('The model is used as an intermediary model by ' - 'invalid_models_tests.Person.friends, but it has more than two ' - 'foreign keys to Person, which is ambiguous and ' - 'is not permitted.'), + ("The model is used as an intermediate model by " + "'invalid_models_tests.Person.friends', but it has more than two " + "foreign keys to 'Person', which is ambiguous."), hint=None, obj=InvalidRelationship, - id='E025', + id='fields.E333', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -238,7 +230,7 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): 'Many-to-many fields with intermediate tables must not be symmetrical.', hint=None, obj=field, - id='E024', + id='fields.E332', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -255,13 +247,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check() expected = [ Error( - ('The field has a relation with model AbstractModel, ' - 'which has either not been installed or is abstract.'), - hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and ' - 'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS ' - 'setting contain the app where AbstractModel is defined?'), + ("Field defines a relation with model 'AbstractModel', " + "which is either not installed, or is abstract."), + hint=None, obj=field, - id='E030', + id='fields.E300', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -278,13 +268,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check(from_model=Model) expected = [ Error( - ('The field has a relation with model AbstractModel, ' - 'which has either not been installed or is abstract.'), - hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and ' - 'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS ' - 'setting contain the app where AbstractModel is defined?'), + ("Field defines a relation with model 'AbstractModel', " + "which is either not installed, or is abstract."), + hint=None, obj=field, - id='E030', + id='fields.E300', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -300,10 +288,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check(from_model=Group) expected = [ Error( - 'ManyToManyFields must not be unique.', + 'ManyToManyFields cannot be unique.', hint=None, obj=field, - id='E022', + id='fields.E330', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -319,10 +307,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Target.bad must have unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.', + "'Target.bad' must set unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.", hint=None, obj=field, - id='E019', + id='fields.E311', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -338,10 +326,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Target.bad must have unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.', + "'Target.bad' must set unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.", hint=None, obj=field, - id='E019', + id='fields.E311', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -364,12 +352,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check() expected = [ Error( - ('No unique=True constraint on field combination ' - '"country_id,city_id" under model Person.'), - hint=('Set unique=True argument on any of the fields ' - '"country_id,city_id" under model Person.'), + ("None of the fields 'country_id', 'city_id' on model 'Person' " + "have a unique=True constraint."), + hint=None, obj=field, - id='E018', + id='fields.E310', ) ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -386,10 +373,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check() expected = [ Error( - 'The field specifies on_delete=SET_NULL, but cannot be null.', - hint='Set null=True argument on the field.', + 'Field specifies on_delete=SET_NULL, but cannot be null.', + hint='Set null=True argument on the field, or change the on_delete rule.', obj=field, - id='E020', + id='fields.E320', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -406,10 +393,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = field.check() expected = [ Error( - 'The field specifies on_delete=SET_DEFAULT, but has no default value.', - hint=None, + 'Field specifies on_delete=SET_DEFAULT, but has no default value.', + hint='Set a default value, or change the on_delete rule.', obj=field, - id='E021', + id='fields.E321', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -424,9 +411,9 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): expected = [ Error( 'Primary keys must not have null=True.', - hint='Set null=False on the field or remove primary_key=True argument.', + hint='Set null=False on the field, or remove primary_key=True argument.', obj=field, - id='E036', + id='fields.E007', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -489,10 +476,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): ] expected_error = Error( - ('The field defines a relation with the model ' - 'invalid_models_tests.SwappedModel, which has been swapped out.'), - hint='Update the relation to point at settings.TEST_SWAPPED_MODEL', - id='E029', + ("Field defines a relation with the model " + "'invalid_models_tests.SwappedModel', which has been swapped out."), + hint="Update the relation to point at 'settings.TEST_SWAPPED_MODEL'.", + id='fields.E301', ) for field in fields: @@ -546,12 +533,12 @@ class AccessorClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Accessor for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.model_set.', - hint=('Rename field Target.model_set or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.rel.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.model_set'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Target.model_set', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.rel'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'), - id='E014', + id='fields.E302', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -567,18 +554,18 @@ class AccessorClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Clash between accessors for Model.foreign and Model.m2m.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for Model.foreign or Model.m2m.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition " + "for 'Model.foreign' or 'Model.m2m'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign'), - id='E016', + id='fields.E304', ), Error( - 'Clash between accessors for Model.m2m and Model.foreign.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for Model.m2m or Model.foreign.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition " + "for 'Model.m2m' or 'Model.foreign'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m'), - id='E016', + id='fields.E304', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -602,12 +589,12 @@ class AccessorClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Accessor for field Model.children clashes with field Child.m2m_clash.', - hint=('Rename field Child.m2m_clash or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.children.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.children' clashes with field name 'Child.m2m_clash'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Child.m2m_clash', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.children'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('children'), - id='E014', + id='fields.E302', ) ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -658,12 +645,12 @@ class ReverseQueryNameClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Reverse query name for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.model.', - hint=('Rename field Target.model or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.rel.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.model'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Target.model', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.rel'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'), - id='E015', + id='fields.E303', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -714,20 +701,20 @@ class ExplicitRelatedNameClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Accessor for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.clash.', - hint=('Rename field Target.clash or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.rel.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.clash'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.rel'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'), - id='E014', + id='fields.E302', ), Error( - 'Reverse query name for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.clash.', - hint=('Rename field Target.clash or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.rel.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.clash'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.rel'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'), - id='E015', + id='fields.E303', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -784,11 +771,11 @@ class ExplicitRelatedQueryNameClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Reverse query name for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.clash.', - hint=('Rename field Target.clash or add/change a related_name ' - 'argument to the definition for field Model.rel.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.clash'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change a related_name " + "argument to the definition for field 'Model.rel'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'), - id='E015', + id='fields.E303', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -804,18 +791,18 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Clash between accessors for Model.first_m2m and Model.second_m2m.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for Model.first_m2m or Model.second_m2m.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.first_m2m' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.second_m2m'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition " + "for 'Model.first_m2m' or 'Model.second_m2m'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('first_m2m'), - id='E016', + id='fields.E304', ), Error( - 'Clash between accessors for Model.second_m2m and Model.first_m2m.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for Model.second_m2m or Model.first_m2m.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.second_m2m' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.first_m2m'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition " + "for 'Model.second_m2m' or 'Model.first_m2m'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('second_m2m'), - id='E016', + id='fields.E304', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -827,12 +814,12 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Accessor for field Model.model_set clashes with field Model.model_set.', - hint=('Rename field Model.model_set or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.model_set.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.model_set' clashes with field name 'Model.model_set'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Model.model_set', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.model_set'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('model_set'), - id='E014', + id='fields.E302', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -844,11 +831,11 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Reverse query name for field Model.model clashes with field Model.model.', - hint=('Rename field Model.model or add/change a related_name ' - 'argument to the definition for field Model.model.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.model' clashes with field name 'Model.model'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Model.model', or add/change a related_name " + "argument to the definition for field 'Model.model'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('model'), - id='E015', + id='fields.E303', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -862,18 +849,18 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Accessor for field Model.m2m clashes with field Model.clash.', - hint=('Rename field Model.clash or add/change a related_name ' - 'argument to the definition for field Model.m2m.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name " + "argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m'), - id='E014', + id='fields.E302', ), Error( - 'Reverse query name for field Model.m2m clashes with field Model.clash.', - hint=('Rename field Model.clash or add/change a related_name ' - 'argument to the definition for field Model.m2m.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.m2m' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name " + "argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m'), - id='E015', + id='fields.E303', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -898,12 +885,12 @@ class SelfReferentialFKClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Accessor for field Model.model_set clashes with field Model.model_set.', - hint=('Rename field Model.model_set or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.model_set.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.model_set' clashes with field name 'Model.model_set'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Model.model_set', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.model_set'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('model_set'), - id='E014', + id='fields.E302', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -915,12 +902,12 @@ class SelfReferentialFKClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Reverse query name for field Model.model clashes with field Model.model.', - hint=('Rename field Model.model or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.model.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.model' clashes with field name 'Model.model'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Model.model', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.model'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('model'), - id='E015', + id='fields.E303', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -933,20 +920,20 @@ class SelfReferentialFKClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Accessor for field Model.foreign clashes with field Model.clash.', - hint=('Rename field Model.clash or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.foreign.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.foreign'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign'), - id='E014', + id='fields.E302', ), Error( - 'Reverse query name for field Model.foreign clashes with field Model.clash.', - hint=('Rename field Model.clash or add/change ' - 'a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for field Model.foreign.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.foreign' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change " + "a related_name argument to the definition " + "for field 'Model.foreign'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign'), - id='E015', + id='fields.E303', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) @@ -976,91 +963,91 @@ class ComplexClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase): errors = Model.check() expected = [ Error( - 'Accessor for field Model.foreign_1 clashes with field Target.id.', - hint=('Rename field Target.id or add/change a related_name ' - 'argument to the definition for field Model.foreign_1.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_1' clashes with field name 'Target.id'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Target.id', or add/change a related_name " + "argument to the definition for field 'Model.foreign_1'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_1'), - id='E014', + id='fields.E302', ), Error( - 'Reverse query name for field Model.foreign_1 clashes with field Target.id.', - hint=('Rename field Target.id or add/change a related_name ' - 'argument to the definition for field Model.foreign_1.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_1' clashes with field name 'Target.id'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Target.id', or add/change a related_name " + "argument to the definition for field 'Model.foreign_1'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_1'), - id='E015', + id='fields.E303', ), Error( - 'Clash between accessors for Model.foreign_1 and Model.m2m_1.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to ' - 'the definition for Model.foreign_1 or Model.m2m_1.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_1' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_1'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to " + "the definition for 'Model.foreign_1' or 'Model.m2m_1'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_1'), - id='E016', + id='fields.E304', ), Error( - 'Clash between reverse query names for Model.foreign_1 and Model.m2m_1.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to ' - 'the definition for Model.foreign_1 or Model.m2m_1.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_1' clashes with reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_1'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to " + "the definition for 'Model.foreign_1' or 'Model.m2m_1'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_1'), - id='E017', + id='fields.E305', ), Error( - 'Clash between accessors for Model.foreign_2 and Model.m2m_2.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument ' - 'to the definition for Model.foreign_2 or Model.m2m_2.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_2' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_2'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument " + "to the definition for 'Model.foreign_2' or 'Model.m2m_2'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_2'), - id='E016', + id='fields.E304', ), Error( - 'Clash between reverse query names for Model.foreign_2 and Model.m2m_2.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to ' - 'the definition for Model.foreign_2 or Model.m2m_2.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_2' clashes with reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_2'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to " + "the definition for 'Model.foreign_2' or 'Model.m2m_2'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_2'), - id='E017', + id='fields.E305', ), Error( - 'Accessor for field Model.m2m_1 clashes with field Target.id.', - hint=('Rename field Target.id or add/change a related_name ' - 'argument to the definition for field Model.m2m_1.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_1' clashes with field name 'Target.id'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Target.id', or add/change a related_name " + "argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m_1'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_1'), - id='E014', + id='fields.E302', ), Error( - 'Reverse query name for field Model.m2m_1 clashes with field Target.id.', - hint=('Rename field Target.id or add/change a related_name ' - 'argument to the definition for field Model.m2m_1.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_1' clashes with field name 'Target.id'.", + hint=("Rename field 'Target.id', or add/change a related_name " + "argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m_1'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_1'), - id='E015', + id='fields.E303', ), Error( - 'Clash between accessors for Model.m2m_1 and Model.foreign_1.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for Model.m2m_1 or Model.foreign_1.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_1' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_1'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition " + "for 'Model.m2m_1' or 'Model.foreign_1'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_1'), - id='E016', + id='fields.E304', ), Error( - 'Clash between reverse query names for Model.m2m_1 and Model.foreign_1.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to ' - 'the definition for Model.m2m_1 or Model.foreign_1.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_1' clashes with reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_1'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to " + "the definition for 'Model.m2m_1' or 'Model.foreign_1'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_1'), - id='E017', + id='fields.E305', ), Error( - 'Clash between accessors for Model.m2m_2 and Model.foreign_2.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for Model.m2m_2 or Model.foreign_2.'), + "Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_2' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_2'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition " + "for 'Model.m2m_2' or 'Model.foreign_2'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_2'), - id='E016', + id='fields.E304', ), Error( - 'Clash between reverse query names for Model.m2m_2 and Model.foreign_2.', - hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition ' - 'for Model.m2m_2 or Model.foreign_2.'), + "Reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_2' clashes with reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_2'.", + hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition " + "for 'Model.m2m_2' or 'Model.foreign_2'."), obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_2'), - id='E017', + id='fields.E305', ), ] self.assertEqual(errors, expected) |