Fixed #30573 -- Rephrased documentation to avoid words that minimise the involved difficulty.

This patch does not remove all occurrences of the words in question.
Rather, I went through all of the occurrences of the words listed
below, and judged if they a) suggested the reader had some kind of
knowledge/experience, and b) if they added anything of value (including
tone of voice, etc). I left most of the words alone. I looked at the
following words:

- simply/simple
- easy/easier/easiest
- obvious
- just
- merely
- straightforward
- ridiculous

Thanks to Carlton Gibson for guidance on how to approach this issue, and
to Tim Bell for providing the idea. But the enormous lion's share of
thanks go to Adam Johnson for his patient and helpful review.

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/docs/internals/contributing/writing-code/working-with-git.txt b/docs/internals/contributing/writing-code/working-with-git.txt
index 60ba1345a4..639f7719b8 100644
--- a/docs/internals/contributing/writing-code/working-with-git.txt
+++ b/docs/internals/contributing/writing-code/working-with-git.txt
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ necessary::
 Publishing work
 ---------------
 
-You can publish your work on GitHub just by doing::
+You can publish your work on GitHub by running::
 
   git push origin ticket_xxxxx
 
@@ -186,9 +186,9 @@ the changes::
     git push -f origin ticket_xxxxx
 
 Note that this will rewrite history of ticket_xxxxx - if you check the commit
-hashes before and after the operation at GitHub you will notice that the
-commit hashes do not match anymore. This is acceptable, as the branch is merely
-a topic branch, and nobody should be basing their work on it.
+hashes before and after the operation at GitHub you will notice that the commit
+hashes do not match anymore. This is acceptable, as the branch is a topic
+branch, and nobody should be basing their work on it.
 
 After upstream has changed
 --------------------------