From e6db084ac8fdf04ba20b5976a1cebfb77d55c97e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell Keith-Magee Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:04:13 +0000 Subject: Fixed #11226 -- Corrected an validation edge case with m2m relations between two models with the same class name. Thanks to pkoch for the report, and to Ramiro Morales for the patch. git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@12489 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37 --- tests/regressiontests/m2m_regress/models.py | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) (limited to 'tests/regressiontests') diff --git a/tests/regressiontests/m2m_regress/models.py b/tests/regressiontests/m2m_regress/models.py index 913e719902..7f6da3341b 100644 --- a/tests/regressiontests/m2m_regress/models.py +++ b/tests/regressiontests/m2m_regress/models.py @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ from django.db import models +from django.contrib.auth import models as auth # No related name is needed here, since symmetrical relations are not # explicitly reversible. @@ -41,6 +42,14 @@ class Worksheet(models.Model): id = models.CharField(primary_key=True, max_length=100) lines = models.ManyToManyField(Line, blank=True, null=True) +# Regression for #11226 -- A model with the same name that another one to +# which it has a m2m relation. This shouldn't cause a name clash between +# the automatically created m2m intermediary table FK field names when +# running syncdb +class User(models.Model): + name = models.CharField(max_length=30) + friends = models.ManyToManyField(auth.User) + __test__ = {"regressions": """ # Multiple m2m references to the same model or a different model must be # distinguished when accessing the relations through an instance attribute. -- cgit v1.3