From 356dfd5308aeace4c2f46405debbbac37890e0bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Malcolm Tredinnick Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:27:19 +0000 Subject: Fixed #7098 -- Old-style related-model order_by() syntax was being incorrectly marked as erroneous. It's just more dangerous and risky, not forbidden. This commit restores backwards compatibility there. git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7490 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37 --- tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'tests/regressiontests') diff --git a/tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py b/tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py index 483aa7218c..5529bced8b 100644 --- a/tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py +++ b/tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py @@ -654,5 +654,9 @@ Bug #7045 -- extra tables used to crash SQL construction on the second use. >>> s = qs.query.as_sql() >>> s = qs.query.as_sql() # test passes if this doesn't raise an exception. +Bug #7098 -- Make sure semi-deprecated ordering by related models syntax still +works. +>>> Item.objects.values('note__note').order_by('queries_note.note', 'id') +[{'note__note': u'n2'}, {'note__note': u'n3'}, {'note__note': u'n3'}, {'note__note': u'n3'}] """} -- cgit v1.3